Robert
@robert@cornershop.network
Save button references? (I know I'm old, but I didn't think I would be that old.)Outside of Speaker Mike Johnson,
there is no bigger poster boy for the rubber-stamp Republican House majority than Jim Jordan.
Jordanās purpose for running the House Judiciary Committee is to abuse its power to investigate those who tried to hold Donald Trump accountable for alleged crimes.
While Republicans in the House filled their committees with leaders who would be loyal to Trump,
Democrats filled their positions with experienced investigators and legislators who know how to use oversight power and navigate congressional hearings effectively.
Rep. Jamie Raskin is one of those Democrats. -- He is an attorney and constitutional scholar, and a person who understands how to properly and effectively use House oversight.
When Jordan gave Raskin a big opening by trying to investigate former Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Maryland Democrat seized on it.
Jim Jordan wants Jack Smith to testify behind closed doors.
Smith wants to testify in public.
Raskin wrote a letter to Jordan urging him to allow Smith to testify before the nation.
Rep. Raskin wrote:
Last week, I applauded your call for transparency about Special Counsel Jack Smithās investigation into how President Trump knowingly retained hundreds of highly classified records at his Mar-a-Lago club and then defied subpoenas, obstructed law enforcement, actively hid evidence, and lied about his continuing retention of those records.
I commended you for apparently joining us in demanding the full release of Mr. Smithās report
āpaid for by American taxpayers
āas well as all accompanying records which the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been desperately concealing.
https://www.politicususa.com/p/jamie-raskin-outsmarts-jim-jordan
US people: If you are white, not racist, not a supporter of ethnic cleansing, but are struggling to pay bills, or don't know how you will afford food next month...
First of all, I am genuinely sorry for the stress you are dealing with. Truly.
Second, this stress was placed on you intentionally. By racists.
Their idea is that you will stop caring about other people and become more racist as you become more desperate.
These racists don't care about *helping* other white people. They don't care about you.
They care about *hurting* Black and brown people, and creating their white ethnostate.
They happily shared stats showing that in pre-war Germany, the nazi party got the most support where hunger and hardship were highest.
They also celebrated the eugenic cruelty that followed the Influenza pandemic, back when "long Covid" or "long flu" were not terms that people understood.
No, I do not think that they invented Covid in a nazi lab.š¤¦šæāāļø
But the worst of them definitely celebrated its arrival, and said "Let 'er rip, this helps us," at first because of the high Black death toll, and later because of the impact on the elderly, and the desperation and healthcare callousness.
Resurecting the ghost of Reagan turns out to be unexpected political dynamite. Since Republicans no longer believe in facts, but they do worship deities, this puts them in the irreconcileable position of having two of their gods issuing unequivocal and diametrically opposite decrees. Feel like we may be hearing more from the Almighty Ronny in the days ahead.
Knowledge is knowing that Frankenstein was not the monster.
Wisdom is understanding that Frankenstein WAS the monster.
Enlightenment is understanding that I, the person who brings this up at every chance in every conversation, am the monster.
!tmdb will redirect the search. (But usually I use the awesome Callsheet app on my iPhone.)Why does the government tackle benefit fraud and ignore tax cheats? Could it be prejudice?
https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2025/10/23/why-does-the-government-tackle-benefit-fraud-and-ignore-tax-cheats-could-it-be-prejudice/
The National Audit Office issued a report yesterday on efforts being made by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) to tackle benefit fraud, and the rate of errors being made in payments of what I call social security.
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*) Ā» 🌐
@david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
If you think the stock market is bad, wait until you look at commodities markets.
Originally, you sold commodities (wheat, steel, whatever) when you produced it. It turns out that itās quite useful to know when you plant a field of corn how much you will be able to sell it for. Itās also useful if, for example, you are building a skyscraper and it will take two years to know how much steel will cost in a yearās time, so you can budget properly.
So the idea of a futures market came about. Rather than buying steel that exists now, you buy the ability to buy steel at a fixed price in the future. Or the ability to sell corn at a fixed price in a yearās time. And now both producers and consumers can operate with significantly reduced risk. Having a guaranteed ability to sell X tons of grain at a known price next year lets you plan the amount that you want to plant, and maybe grow a bit more than you know you can sell because you wonāt make a loss if you can sell more. So far, so sensible.
(Aside: a lot of the antitrust laws in the USA exist because of one person who managed to achieve an onion monopoly. This is an amazing story, and well worth reading, but itās most fun because laws are written as changes to existing laws, so a lot of the antitrust laws in the USA are of the form āonions, and other things that are not onionsā).
The problem with this model is that it lacks liquidity. A lot of people (especially on the consumer side) donāt want to plan so far ahead. They will buy wheat if itās available, but might buy corn if itās cheaper. They may buy steel if itās available, but might just put of construction to next year if itās too expensive. And that makes it harder to plan. To address this, you allow speculation.
Speculation was quite controversial. A speculator buys and sells commodity futures, but does not want the commodities. They are selling a service where they take risk in exchange for profit. If they expect the price of some commodity to be $110 next year, they might offer to buy it for $100. The producer gets a worse price than they would probably get if they didnāt trade futures, but they get to guarantee that price. If their production cost is $50, they make a big profit, guaranteed. The speculator then has to find someone willing to actually buy the commodity for over $100. If they do, they make money. If they donāt, they take the loss, the producer does not.
There were a lot of regulations around speculation, including the ratio of producers and consumers to speculators that could participate in the market. It was viewed as a necessary evil to increase liquidity. And liquidity is important. Markets donāt function without it. But then some smart and evil people managed to convince the government (pretty sure it was Reagan, itās a fair bet that anything bad in market regulation was probably his fault) that speculation existed to reduce risk (true) and that reducing risk is good (true) so itās important to relax regulations to reduce risk for speculators (false, the entire reason speculators exist is to take on risks from people in the real economy). So now thereās far more trading between speculators than between buyers and sellers of the actual commodity. Thereās no shortage of liquidity, but the flip side of liquidity is volatility (both mean, roughly, that prices can move rapidly. If you want that to happen, itās liquidity, if you donāt then itās volatility).
A lot of the same thing happened with the stock market.
The MÄori people descend from Polynesians whose ancestors emigrated from Taiwan to Melanesia between 3000-1000 BC, and then travelled east, reaching the Society Islands 1000 CE.
After a pause of 200 to 300 years, a new wave of exploration led to the discovery and settlement of New Zealand.
Because we need good news: Gary Larson is drawing again (he bought a tablet, taught himself how to use it, and suddenly drawing was fun again): https://www.thefarside.com/new-stuff/
(This counterintuitive tidbit of knowledge was shared with me by a forensic pathologist who specializes in immunoresponses.)
My spouse and I now have an interesting experiment going: which enhances your 5G reception more, getting a Covid shot and a flu shot in the same arm on the same day, or getting one in each arm? Confounding factors: we have different length arms, and I'm not sure which is a better match for 5G wavelengths. Also, I use a computer a lot more, which means that the extra microchips I've just been injected with will help me a lot more.
Weāre getting to the point where as a tech company all you have to do is not be fascist or actively sabotage your own product with AI bullshit. You donāt even have to be good, you just have to not actively be bad
Inside of you are two wolves and now you're questioning the life choices that lead to you agreeing to shoot this Teen Wolf parody porn in the first place.
History